﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><marc:record xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:grid="http://www.tempuri.org/dsONE.xsd"><marc:leader>00000nam##2200000#a#4500</marc:leader><marc:controlfield tag="001">045455</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="003">SLIM21</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="005">20260902113600.0</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="008">260902s                     0000 00eng d</marc:controlfield><marc:datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">John Reuben Davies</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">Reading the Split Moon: Celestial Portents in Medieval Kerala and Scotland</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="c">John Reuben Davies</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="500" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">In  Higher Education for the Future 2026-07-01 [Vol. 13 Issue. 2].  2026-07-01.--(370)
</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="520" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">Stories about the splitting of the moon provide a basis for comparison across Latin monastic chronicles, Arabic Islamic narratives and Malayalam histories. The resemblances between these accounts emerge from distinct religious, political and institutional settings. In each context, a disturbance in the heavens becomes a way of articulating royal authority, moral order and communal self-understanding. Comparison here becomes an analytical problem to be handled with care rather than evidence of transmission. This approach makes it possible to read connected and disconnected histories together, without collapsing them into a single explanatory line. This article also shows how digital editions and collective reading practices render manuscript differences newly visible. They allow variation, disagreement and editorial choice to be traced across corpora and at scale. In doing so, they support a method of comparative medieval history that is disciplined in its handling of sources and transferable beyond the cases examined here.</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4"><marc:subfield code="a">Lunar eclipse,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">Kerala,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">Cistercian historiography,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">digital editions,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">Islam and Christianity,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">comparative medieval studies,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">collective reading,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">Melrose Abbey</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">John Reuben Davies</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="978" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">NAENGRM045455</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="f">Y</marc:subfield></marc:datafield></marc:record>