﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><marc:record xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:grid="http://www.tempuri.org/dsONE.xsd"><marc:leader>00000nam##2200000#a#4500</marc:leader><marc:controlfield tag="001">045450</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="003">SLIM21</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="005">20260902113900.0</marc:controlfield><marc:controlfield tag="008">260902s                     0000 00eng d</marc:controlfield><marc:datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">Ipsita Das https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9361-4654 and Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">A Theoretical Model on Medical Tourism Destination and Quality Provision</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="c">Ipsita Das https and Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="500" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">In  Studies in Microeconomics 2026-05-01 [Vol. 14 Issue. 2].  2026-05-01.
</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="520" ind1="0" ind2="0"><marc:subfield code="a">While empirical and conceptual studies highlight the interdependence of hospitals and allied firms in medical-tourism destinations, few offer theoretical models capturing this dimension. This study develops a model featuring two interdependent sectors: hospitals providing medical care and allied-firms offering complementary services (e.g., accommodation, food, transport) that support the stay of patients and their companions in the destination. We examine two market structures: a monopoly hospital providing homogeneous service quality and a vertically differentiated duopoly comprising high-quality and low-quality hospitals. Each structure is analyzed under two institutional settings: non-coordination, where hospitals independently set service-quality to maximize their own profits; and coordination, where a central planning-authority chooses quality levels to maximize joint sectoral profit. Results show a trade-off—coordination improves accessibility and allied-sector profits through lower medical service quality and prices, while non-coordination yields higher medical-service quality and greater profits for the hospital-sector but reduces demand and profitability of the allied-sector. Sensitivity analysis suggests that widening income-dispersion improves medical service-quality under monopoly, but may lower the quality levels under duopoly if the high-end hospital’s initial quality is sufficiently high.
JEL Classifications: D42, D43, L83, Z320</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4"><marc:subfield code="a">Medical-tourism destination,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">hospital-sector,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">allied-sector,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">monopoly,</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="a">duopoly</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">Ipsita Das https and Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)</marc:subfield></marc:datafield><marc:datafield tag="978" ind1=" " ind2=" "><marc:subfield code="a">NAENGRM045450</marc:subfield><marc:subfield code="f">Y</marc:subfield></marc:datafield></marc:record>